The record on America and the Middle East is not flattering. Twenty years fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan. Nearly nine years fighting the insurgency in Iraq. The Arab Spring, its aftermath, and today a confrontation with Iran that has no visible end. The United States has spent enormous treasure and blood in a region it has, by one historian's account, persistently misread.
That argument belongs to Simon Sebag Montefiore, and on October 1 he will make it live — in uptown Manhattan, alongside Free Press founder and CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss, for the opening night of his U.S. book tour.
The book is The Cauldron: The Making of the Modern Middle East, already a No. 1 bestseller in the UK. Montefiore's thesis, as described in the event materials, is direct: America's quagmires in the region stem from a deep misunderstanding that cuts across both the left and the right. The diagnosis is bipartisan. So, presumably, is the indictment.
Montefiore is not a newcomer to large subjects. His previous works include Jerusalem: The Biography, Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar, Young Stalin, The Romanovs: 1613–1918, and The World: A Family History of Humanity — a bibliography that spans empires, ideologies, and centuries. In The Cauldron, he turns that same wide-angle lens on the Middle East, tracing the last 125 years: from 1900 through kings and terrorists, diplomats and dictators, and the cultures and faiths that have shaped every conflict since.
Weiss, who describes this as her first live event in nearly a year, will lead the conversation. Paying subscribers to The Free Press received early ticket access through September 10. Ticket tiers include options with a signed copy of the book and, for twelve guests, an intimate post-event dinner with Montefiore.
---
The conversation matters beyond the book launch. For years, American foreign policy has been driven by assumptions about the Middle East that events have repeatedly falsified — assumptions held with equal confidence by administrations of both parties. The cost has been measured in lives, dollars, and strategic credibility. What Montefiore offers, and what an evening like this can surface, is something rarer than a policy prescription: a serious historical account of how the region actually works, built from primary sources and long perspective rather than the crisis-of-the-week briefing cycle.
Follow the incentive, not the press release. The foreign-policy establishment has had decades to get the Middle East right and has not. The case for returning to first principles — to history, to culture, to the forces that predate any American intervention — is not ideological. It is simply the record. That is exactly the kind of conversation worth having in public, on a stage, with the lights on.
